form that existed upon the planet previously. “The idea of the steady-state economy presents us with an beagle beaglevengers marvel avengers dogs lover shirt alternative. This term is somewhat misleading, however, because it suggests that we simply need to maintain the size of the existing economy and stop seeking further growth. It
beagle beaglevengers marvel avengers dogs lover shirt
end only and in no way support the high end. Like the NY Times, you left out long term crony capitalist that defrauded the UN of millions for personal gain, beyond his power seeking aided by corrupt political connections. As the book outlines, various key people ardently “believed” and campaigned that there was an ozone depletion problem, long before any real evidence on attribution emerged. The real story is of wild narratives of environmental disaster from a problem that was easily and cheaply resolved. If indeed it was a problem the chemistry is far too complex for me. I have tried. The acid rain disaster was also quickly and easily fixed. The chemistry and the environmental responses far simpler and the impacts on biota and buildings not discernible. A selection battle. Over millions of selections morphs re-transmissions of narrative elements, the narrative that beagle beaglevengers marvel avengers dogs lover shirt gains the most circulation within the domain is the emergent one we see. In practice it is usually an ‘umbrella’ narrative with a tightly coupled set of co-evolved stories beneath, and likewise these spread out to a pyramid below. Vast possibilities exist at all times, which grants great adaptive power, and the situation at any one moment of time is represented by the appearance frequencies of each oft repeated narrative. This is analogous to the frequencies of adaptive genetic material in a population for biological evolution. Also explains why dominant cultural consensuses defended to the hilt as ‘settled’ or immovable, actually constantly evolve, and often have a curious vagueness about ‘what’ the consensus actually is about, in apparent contradiction to its promoted solidity. We might hope that climate doesn’t shift extremely in the interim but in the words of Doris Day que sera sera. Shift it will or times this century. It might pay to keep a weather eye out and to have modular nuclear up our sleeves.
Maybe you are asking the wrong A.I. system about Attribution Theory? There is a million climate A.I. system being built by Microsoft called AI for Earth and there are other systems being built by big tech companies like IBM that are trying answer that question. You are correct. There is little evidence of attribution theory as used by the IPCC with its attribution statement. I think it was brought into real science from the field of psychology. Filed under the laws that govern the human condition; for the majority of rank and file investors, the consensus, they exclusively “only go on the long side of an issue” when they have motivational reasoning to do so, or they’re not in the market at all. This usually represents the consensus for any idea, in the stock market or otherwise. Circumstances change daily in markets based on changing facts and dynamics. Volatility is inflated by this dynamic because of emotion; volatility in itself draws an audience who want to be part of an issue for vested interests if the issue is growing, because it’s the “thing”, it shows promise of something. By the IPCC’s own reports, there is no consensus on the extent of the warming ECS .C to .C . This appears to be obfuscation, however, because actual observations of around .Ccentury are very much closer to the low end than the high end. The high end sensitivity appears to be politically motivated to include the extreme. There is not observational support for the idea of high sensitivity. So, perhaps there should be consensus that warming around .C per century in the absence of other observations. If the scientific work was more convincing there wouldn’t be any debate beyond the normal academic stuff. As it is there is just tribal politics at the base and with all the money and power in play it will take decades to straighten out. Personally I first thought it quite impossible for someone not trained extensively in climate science to be in a position to from an independent opinion about the claims. But thankfully science in asymmetric and it suffices to find one flaw in the argument to invalidate it. No need to understand it all. this is the one single thing that comes through loud and clear in the climate debate,from both sides. an unjustifiable sense of importance relating to a species that in the history of the universe will last about the same time as an ant fart. get over yourselves. there need be no great goal. the human species is no more important and certainly no less likely to avoid extinction events than any other life
Click to buy beagle beaglevengers marvel avengers dogs lover shirt and hope you like
See more in here