where employees are dispatched from a primary workplace each day, best of both worlds a tribute to van halen crocs thus making it impractical to either carry a written program with them, or to have a duplicate copy at each site serviced .
best of both worlds a tribute to van halen crocs
A number of the comments received subsequent to OMB’s actions favor keeping the MSDSs in a central office location and providing them on request (Exs. 11-1, , , and ). best of both worlds a tribute to van halen crocs Others simply object to MSDSs on every site, and support OMB’s approach (Exs. 11-13, , , , and ). These employers claim that employees are not interested in the MSDSs (Ex. 11-6); there are too many of them to keep them at the site (Ex. 11-24); and there is no place to keep them on the site (Ex. ). The issue became somewhat confused when OMB disapproved the requirement to “provide” MSDSs on a multi-employer worksite (Ex. 4-67), as opposed to the multi-employer worksite provision to have methods that would make the already – present MSDSs available to the other employers.
OMB’s action effectively removed the employee protections of paragraph . Furthermore, there appears to be some misunderstanding about what a multi-employer worksite is (Ex. ). Such a site is not limited to construction. Any type of workplace where there are employees of more than one employer working is a multi-employer site. It is likely that every worksite is a multi-employer worksite at some point. Few comments were received on this modification, but those that were submitted generally supported the approach proposed (Exs. 11-67, 11-90, and ). OSHA has incorporated it into the final rule, but removed the phrase “at a central location.” The written program must be available at the primary workplace upon request, consistent with existing requirements in paragraph . It should be noted that as in the situation with MSDSs, this exception is limited to work operations