In fact, there will be many workplaces that will not be required coors light beer crocs to report anything under SARA that will nevertheless be covered under the HCS.
coors light beer crocs
Mineral oil mist was the concern in this comment. Mineral oil mist has a specific PEL and is thus a hazardous chemical under the rule. coors light beer crocs OSHA does not agree that it would be appropriate to exempt any such chemical that is specifically regulated. Therefore, chemical manufacturers or importers must develop and transmit an MSDS and label for any substance with a specific OSHA PEL. It was also suggested that physical hazards should not be considered to trigger coverage as the HCS was designed to address health effects, not physical hazards (Ex. ). This statement is simply not true. The HCS has always covered all types of health and physical hazards. (See definition of “hazardous chemical” in 29 CFR 1910.1200 ). The purposes of the standard can be well – served even with the omission of nuisance dusts.
Any solid can produce nuisance dusts. Requiring MSDSs on nuisance dusts would be impractical in some cases (e.g., floor sweeping dusts), and of little use in others because those do not present a significant health hazard. Consumer products which meet the definition in paragraph are totally exempted from the requirements of the rule. Those which do not meet this exemption are exempted from further labeling under . Employers must still provide MSDSs and training on these products. We believe these changes make the exemption clearer, and yet do not diminish the protections that are necessary for workers exposed to the chemicals involved. Consistency with SARA requirements is not a persuasive argument either. Since EPA has adopted a permanent reporting threshold of 10,000 pounds for most hazardous chemicals , there will be many products covered in the workplace under the HCS that will not be reported under SARA.