An additional argument is that chemicals are already handled safely on construction sites dos equis cerveza beer crocs (Exs. 11-9, 11-83, and ), and in particular, that compliance with existing training requirements in 29 CFR 1926.21
dos equis cerveza beer crocs
Part of the purpose of the HCS is to increase awareness regarding these potential effects. In fact, improved reporting of occupational illnesses and injuries caused by chemical exposures dos equis cerveza beer crocs is expected to be one of the positive effects of the HCS. The ability of employers to identify occupational illnesses with chemical exposures is always a concern, particularly since the effects of exposure are effects which may also be caused by other factors. As cited in the original NPRM preamble , the Bureau of Labor Statistics noted this reporting disparity in its annual report. “The recording and reporting of illness continue to present some measuring problem since employers are often unable to recognize some illnesses as being work related. The annual survey includes data on only current and visible illnesses of workers;
it does not include data on illnesses which might surface later.” Although the AGC claims in its post-hearing brief that “the rulemaking record as a whole does not support the finding that the standard is reasonably necessary to reduce significant risk” in the construction industry (Ex. 84), OSHA does not agree. The AGC cites as its primary evidence the statements made by its own representatives and those of other industry sources that the rule is not needed. OSHA believes that the record accumulated since the 1987 rule was published amply demonstrates that the majority of the participating representatives of the construction industry do not want the rule to apply to them. That, however, is quite different than demonstrating that the rule is neither necessary nor feasible in the construction industry. OSHA does not believe that the record evidence supports either of those conclusions.