The liberal rejection of world government does not mean, national football league houston texans go texans full printing ugly sweater however, that most liberal political theorists are proponents of the status quo or traditional state sovereignty.
national football league houston texans go texans full printing ugly sweater
as crucial to bringing about “stronger global regulatory institutions tied to principles of global and local democracy” . As the many liberal proposals for moral improvement of the world order indicate, national football league houston texans go texans full printing ugly sweater liberal objections to world government—whether they take the form of tyranny/homogeneity arguments and/or the inefficiency/soullessness objections—are not motivated by a complacent attitude towards the contemporary world order and its resulting conditions . As Charles Jones has put it, these valid and plausible objections to world government do not show that “the status quo is preferable to some alternative arrangement” . While liberal theorists acknowledge the tyrannical potential of a world government, they also acknowledge that “sovereign states are themselves often the cause of the rights-violations of their citizens” .
Kok-Chor Tan characterizes liberal proposals for world order to involve, therefore, neither world government nor absolute state sovereignty. Instead, liberals have argued consistently for restrictions on the traditional powers of sovereignty, as well as for the vertical dispersion of sovereignty, “upwards towards supranational bodies, and also downwards toward particular communities within states” . In such a world order, states become “another level of appeal, and not the sole and final one” . Thomas Pogge argues that realizing “a peaceful and ecologically sound future will … require supranational institutions and organizations that limit the sovereignty rights of states more severely than is the current practice” . He sees this development to be possible only when a majority of states are stable democracies (213–4). Pogge thus appears to agree with Rawls that the path to perpetual peace lies in promoting the development of well-ordered states, characterized by democratically representative, responsive and responsible domestic governments.