can easily learn and understand what EO 1 expressly says postal worker mail carrier circle christmas ornament that the findings of the Truth Commission are not ultimate or binding however merely recommendatory.
postal worker mail carrier circle christmas ornament
By the very nature of an investigation or prosecution, there should be a give attention to specific act or acts of an individual or a group of individuals. postal worker mail carrier circle christmas ornament Fourth, the newer the alleged acts of graft and corruption, the extra readily available would be the witnesses, and the extra simply the witnesses can recall with accuracy the relevant events. Inaction over time means the loss not solely of witnesses but additionally of material paperwork, not to point out the loss of public curiosity. Third, all the past Presidents, excluding Presidents Ramos, Estrada and Arroyo, are already lifeless. The potential witnesses to alleged acts of graft and corruption through the Presidencies of the deceased presidents may be dead or unavailable.
In reality, the one dwelling President whose administration has not been investigated by its successor administration is President Arroyo. First, the prescriptive period for the most severe acts of graft and corruption underneath the Revised Penal Code is 20 years,47 15 years for offenses punishable underneath the Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act,48 and 12 years for offenses punishable under special penal legal guidelines that don’t expressly provide for prescriptive periods.49 Any investigation should give attention to alleged acts of graft and corruption inside the last 20 years, almost half of which or 9 years is under the Arroyo administration. Second, even if the Truth Commission is renamed the “Fact-Finding Commission,” the same argument can also be raised — that the public may mechanically perceive the findings of the Fact-Finding Commission as the unquestionable “information,” and any subsequent contrary findings by the Ombudsman or Sandiganbayan as “non-factual.” This argument is bereft of benefit because the public