equate people who do not believe in climate change to people who believe in crazy youtube conspiracy videos. retro apes together strong retro amc gorilla rocket diamond hands shirt Why on earth would the majority of scientists in the world jointly just want to go “hey let’s just fuck with these people and tell them bullshit”. Scientists are not lying. You’re lying to
retro apes together strong retro amc gorilla rocket diamond hands shirt
our planet increases in temperature would decrease. This is important because if we do not make conscious decision early on then we will basically be screwing over everyone living on this planet not so far down the line. Due to this dilemma, it is important we make conscious decisions regarding our emissions starting as early as now. I believe climate change is in fact a real thing, though many people continue to deny it. Through research and examination into the earth’s past we can see that its climate has continuously fluctuated throughout its retro apes together strong retro amc gorilla rocket diamond hands shirt existence, proving that the climate does in fact change and it is totally normal. However I also do believe humans have done a great deal to cause changes to the earth’s atmosphere, altering the climate to change in a different direction or rate than it naturally would have gone. I feel that if we as humans were to all come together to become more sustainable and change how we to live in order to stop negatively affecting the climate, then it would be totally possible to prevent drastically changing the climate. However, in my opinion, I just do not think that the entire human race would ever be able to join forces and effectively work together on one goal. At the current moment, I completely buy into the idea that climate change is happening. I think it is clear that our impact on the environment over the last couple hundred years has been vastly detrimental to the health of our planet. I do believe that if we do not make huge strides to reduce the human race’s environmental impact, we will eventually completely destroy the planet. This being said, I think we are allowed to remain optimistic about the future as we still have an opportunity to avoid catastrophe. And even if we don’t avoid catastrophe, the optimist in me wants to believe that technology will have progressed far enough to offer a solution or the ability to move to another planet. Climate change is a global issue that demands cooperation on an international scale – its “solution” is multifaceted and complex, demanding not only years of scientific research, but also, more importantly, the attentiveness of global leaders to constantly evolving economic and environmental landscapes. As humanity struggles to plot a course of action safely navigating these landscapes, policy makers must make common sense decisions – they must be emotionless and politically removed, limited only by their observations of the conditions of the world and their ability to rationalize them. This concept finds meaningful expression in the work of Gregory Mankiw, who served as chief economic advisor under President Bush. Despite not fitting the political mold of a typical environmentalist, Mankiw saw an opportunity to cut both Carbon emissions and payroll taxes.
His Carbon Tax is a parallel for my vision of common sense, and hopefully, a precedent for future legislation. I wouldn’t say that my personal views on climate change are in any way radically different from the norm – that is, I ascribe the current trajectory of carbon emissions to anthropogenic causes, and trust the data that tells us that passing a degree Celsius ceiling on temperature increase may cause irreparable damage to our planet. Unfortunately, I also believe humans are innately selfishly motivated, especially those who have reached positions of great wealth andor power, and environmentally regulations generally contradict those selfish motivations; this making it very difficult to implement concrete measures against carbon emissions and the like. Last week I read an article in the Wall Street Journal. It was an article on climate change. Even thought I went into reading this article fully aware how right wing opinion pieces in the journal are, the ignorance still did not fail to surprise me. The article talked about how the effects of climate change have not really lived up to the scientists’ predictions hence we should not worry about it.