but the rulemaking arbitrarily relegates the affidavit of support to a non-substantial factor. custom name jersey buffalo bills shirt The commenter disagreed that the affidavit of support should just be one factor and stated that the proposed rule
custom name jersey buffalo bills shirt
One commenter expressed concern that by using a lookback period, even individuals who were able to increase their earnings to a point where assistance is no longer needed will be penalized. custom name jersey buffalo bills shirt Adding to this, a commenter that the proposed lookback period will disproportionately hurt those who are gainfully employed and may therefore be eligible to access benefits for longer than those who are not employed. Two commenters stated this proposed regulation diminishes the consideration of a sufficient affidavit of support in the determination of likely to become a public charge, and drastically diminishes the sponsor’s role as they exist within the current standards. One commenter said the affidavit of support requirement can be hard to meet for some potential adjustment of status applicants.
The commenter said if the petitioner’s income and assets are not adequate, it can be difficult to find another person (a “joint sponsor”) who is willing to hand over their sensitive identification and financial documents and sign a binding contract to ensure the intending immigrant will not depend on public benefits. why the existence of a binding contract from a financially-capable sponsor, such as the affidavit of support that used to be sufficient for public charge purposes would not satisfy the standard for purposes of public charge, and others stated that this is especially the case, when the question addressed with the affidavit of support is whether an immigrant is likely to become a public charge. Another commenter stated that the affidavit of support, by statutory definition, requires the immigrant to demonstrate financial support to ensure that he or she is not a public charge,