unless they are “significantly” greater than consumer everything will kill you so choose something fun skull and helicopter retro poster exposure or that such products should be completely exempted (Exs. 5-53, 5-72, 5-88, 5-93, 5-94, and 5-97).
everything will kill you so choose something fun skull and helicopter retro poster
MSDSs provide information that is necessary for the protection of exposed workers. Training cannot be done adequately without the information on the MSDS for the product. everything will kill you so choose something fun skull and helicopter retro poster Others suggested that OSHA provide guidance on what it considers to be a consumer product (Exs. 11-38, ). As OSHA stated in the preamble to the NPRM, a consumer product is anything that can be purchased in a retail store and is therefore available to the general public for personal or household use. One commenter also suggested that the exemption from the Maine right-to-know standard that was quoted in the NPRM was a better alternative (Ex. 11-93). We do not agree, and believe the changes incorporated herein address the situation appropriately. The legislative history for SARA does not discuss the household or consumer product exemption.
OSHA’s rule preceded the SARA legislation, and it can be presumed that the exemptions in SARA were intended by Congress to address the different needs of community right-to-know versus worker right-to-know. Community right-to-know under SARA entails informing the general public and emergency response facilities about chemicals in their neighborhoods that could cause hazardous conditions during emergency situations. The HCS involves informing employees about the chemicals they are potentially exposed to on a day-to-day basis as a result of their work. The SARA exemption of consumer products was not a determination by Congress that such coverage is unnecessary in the workplace. There were some comments submitted on the coverage of consumer products following the publication of the revised final rule. A number of them felt that they could not define what exposures in the workplace would be comparable to consumer exposure, and that the rule should exempt such exposures
18×12, 24×16, 36×24, 48×32