[best selling products] nurse brew ativan 2 haldol 5 benadryl 50 halloween retro poster

While acknowledging that there were alternative, nurse brew ativan 2 haldol 5 benadryl 50 halloween retro poster non-trespassory means whereby the union could communicate with employees, the Board held that contact

nurse brew ativan 2 haldol 5 benadryl 50 halloween retro poster

Martinez recorded about 19 minutes of videotape. The tape shows that demonstrators in the street significantly affected traffic. nurse brew ativan 2 haldol 5 benadryl 50 halloween retro poster Traffic slowed to a crawl as some drivers attempted to negotiate through the crowd, while other drivers made U-turns to avoid the crowd. The “bargaining table” and some benches in the street blocked traffic and there were demonstrators sitting on cars. The tape also shows that, at one point, a large number of demonstrators entered the Respondent’s office as a group. Martinez testified that he recognized only 12 of the demonstrators as being employees of the Respondent, while a union official testified that she recognized about 40 employees. Either way, a majority of the approximately 100 demonstrators appeared not to be employees of the Respondent. Three employees eventually

made their way into the office with a written demand for recognition, which the Respondent rejected. In Enterprise Leasing Co—Southeast LLC, 357 NLRB No. 159 , a Board majority refused to set aside union election victory where the union solicited employees to have their photographs appear in campaign literature and that literature then included the picture of one employee who did not agree. The majority decision distinguished its holding from the Board’s decision in Allegheny Ludlum Corp., 333 NLRB 734 , which held that the employer unlawfully polled employees to participate in a campaign video. The majority and dissent disagreed over whether Allegheny Ludlum should apply to unions as well as employers. See also Nu Skin International, 307 NLRB 223 , in which photographing employees attending the union’s picnic luncheon was not found to be objectionable. The union successfully challenged the company’s refusal to allow nonemployee organizers onto its property before the Board.