Similarly, DHS does not single out or treat differently personalized name jersey baltimore ravens shirt any one health-related or medical condition over another but has continuously
personalized name jersey baltimore ravens shirt
in all facets of community life, through culturally competent programs. . . ” The programs within the DD Act are funded through congressional appropriations for the Administration for Community personalized name jersey baltimore ravens shirt Living, which are not related to Medicaid or TANF appropriations or other federal benefit programs covered by the proposed public charge rule. The State Councils on Developmental Disabilities, Protection and Advocacy Systems, University Centers of Excellence in Developmental Disabilities, and Projects of National Significance participate in capacity building, systems change, advocacy, protect legal and human rights of people with developmental disabilities, conduct research, provide inter-disciplinary training for students and fellows, leadership training, direct support services training, community based training, and clinical or other training to strengthen the workforce that serves individuals with developmental disabilities.
Title II of the ADA does not govern DHS’s actions in this context. In addition, unlike in the ADA provision and the regulatory provision discussed in Olmstead, Congress did not single out disability in section 212 of the Act. As explained in the NPRM, DHS has carefully considered the interaction between various federal laws and regulations with respect to discrimination and determined that considering, as part of the health factor, an applicant’s disability diagnosis, in the context of the alien’s individual circumstances and how it affects his or her ability to work, attend school, or otherwise care for himself or herself, is not inconsistent with these laws. The alien’s disability is treated just like any other medical condition that affects an alien’s likelihood, in the totality of the circumstances, of becoming a public charge—it is neither singled out nor treated differently and, within the totality of the circumstances, is also not the sole basis for an inadmissibility finding.