For example, the rule might result in reduced revenues personalized name jersey los angeles chargers full printing shirt for healthcare providers participating in Medicaid, companies that manufacture medical supplies or pharmaceuticals,
personalized name jersey los angeles chargers full printing shirt
immigration advocacy groups, health care providers of all types, non-profit organizations, non-governmental organizations, and religious organizations, among others, personalized name jersey los angeles chargers full printing shirt may need or want to become familiar with the provisions of this final rule. DHS believes such non-profit organizations and other advocacy groups might choose to read the rule to provide information to those foreign-born non-citizens that might be affected by a reduction in federal and state transfer payments. Familiarization costs incurred by those not directly regulated are indirect costs. There also may be additional reductions in transfer payments from states to individuals who may choose to disenroll from or forego enrollment in public benefits program. For example, the Federal Government funds all SNAP food expenses, but only 50 percent of allowable administrative
costs for regular operating expenses. Similarly, Federal Medical Assistance Percentages in some U.S. Department of Health and Human Services programs, like Medicaid, can vary from between 50 percent to an enhanced rate of 100 percent in some cases. Since the state share of federal financial participation varies from state to state, DHS uses the average FMAP across all states and U.S. territories of 59 percent to estimate the amount of state transfer payments. Therefore, the 10-year undiscounted amount of state transfer payments of the provisions of this final rule is about $1.01 billion annually. The 10-year discounted amount of state transfer payments of the provisions of this final rule would be approximately $8.63 billion at a 3 percent discount rate, and about $7.12 billion at a 7 percent discount rate. Finally, DHS recognizes that reductions in federal and state transfers under federal benefit programs may have impacts on state and local economies, large and small businesses, and individuals.