needs to be more narrowly defined for everyone’s safety and well-being. shark co and bath soap established wash your fins retro poster This issue is easily solved, in my opinion. I think that most people requiring a true
shark co and bath soap established wash your fins retro poster
It’s not just about one person’s needs vs. another’s. I don’t think the intent of the original law matches up with the results, so there really is some shark co and bath soap established wash your fins retro poster tweaking that needs to be done to address the problems that have been mentioned in these posts. It won’t remove the allergy issue, but it may make it more possible to cope with it using medication. There has to be something that can be written to make it harder for people to abuse needed accommodations and as easy for airlines to enforce as checking our ID is when we check-in at the airport. Grouping ESA’s along with highly trained service animals has opened the doors for too much abuse to happen and everyone is unhappy and endangered by it.
An airline’s focus is to transport us from Point A to Point B as profitably as possible. Their concern for the comfort and enjoyment of the experience has gone out the window since deregulation and they will only do what they have to do without having to be the gatekeepers for who gets to fly and who doesn’t. That is why they are not going to take the time to figure out which animals are service, which are ESA’s, and which are pets. It’s just more expedient for them to wave them all on board and let people grouse about it. Everyone scores some valid points and I’m throwing my agreement in with those that point to how poorly the law and regulations stemming from it are written. What kind of animals qualify for entree into public places, especially ones that we can’t readily remove ourselves from,
18×12, 24×16, 36×24, 48×32