Such debates shud not be taken as the final verdict. well said! The washington post at least nats are champiosn washington nationals 2019 poster This is exactly what I too have been trying to tell everyone, but the prob is, most of us read
The washington post at least nats are champiosn washington nationals 2019 poster
what about what happened before 2014? I salute with all humility. Sir jai hind at first I would encourage you to take a tour of J&K and other militant effected states as a combatant The washington post at least nats are champiosn washington nationals 2019 poster and I am sure after that tour your perception will be changed for ever…. You can find your ground realities in the Dnl Kevi Vor replies. It’s a debate which brings out both the sides and gives an wholesome Idea it can be irrespective of their personal opinions, profession etc. U asked “so what?” Ok let me reply… Debates are about giving your views on the topic, but mainly with the intention to win. Right? There will be views expressed both in favour of the topic and against the topic.
With just one side of the debate competition, we cannot judge, unless we also hear what the other debator spoke. One sided debate is what Brut has shown here. And this debator won second prize, which the video also says clearly. So, who won first prize and what were his views? We shud hear both, I think. Such debates are part of their personality development. Haven’t we seen such debates in schools and colleges? That’s the only point I’m trying to make. Brut, as usual, has cherry picked only one side of the debate. Similarly, another video was shown with just one side of the woman’s debate. Social media is unnecessarily making us debate on this subject, which is already over and done with! In such debates, most of the times, the feelings are not genuine, as they debate with the intention to win.
18×12, 24×16, 36×24, 48×32