Several objected to any labels for shipments of whole grain (Exs. 11-94, , , and ), canada flag crocs also indicating that all facilities already have both labels and MSDSs.
canada flag crocs
(Ex. 5-74). OSHA recognizes that although it is possible for an employer to incidentally purchase a hazardous chemical from any type of retail establishment, canada flag crocs it is not reasonable to expect every retail store that happens to carry such materials to keep a file of MSDSs in case an employer decides to make a random purchase at the store. We further recognize that such random purchases would normally be of small amounts that would generally be used as a consumer uses them, and thus would be exempt under the rule anyway. However, even in those cases where they are used in greater quantities, it appears more reasonable to place the burden on the user in that situation to obtain the MSDS than to have every retail establishment keep large numbers of them on file.
This provision also limits the number of establishments to which distributors of such products have to transmit MSDSs. Other comments on labeling. A number of comments were received suggesting that the labeling requirements be changed. In particular, it was suggested that the information on the labels be expanded in lieu of requiring material safety data sheets (see, e.g, 11-8, 11-75, , , , , and ). “For non-manufacturers, it is more efficient for workers to obtain their warnings from the labels on containers of chemical products. The labels accompany each product and are always readily available to the user. Labels are required to contain all significant dangers.” Ex. . With regard to this change in requirement for shipments of whole grain, most of the comments from the grain industry were concerned with totally exempting grain dust rather than the specific labeling limitation.