As noted earlier in this preamble, for example, proud to have served army veteran crocs the Coalition cost estimates for a firm were based largely on accomplishment of activities that were not required to comply. Ex. .
proud to have served army veteran crocs
Similarly, the requirements for preparation of a written compliance plan, provision and maintenance of MSDSs, and provision of information and training should not have an adverse environmental impact. proud to have served army veteran crocs Accordingly, this document’s modifications to the HCS also will not have a significant impact on the environment outside the workplace. Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq., the Assistant Secretary certifies that modifications to the existing HCS contained in this final rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. This final rule has not substantively changed the HCS promulgated on August 24, 1987. The changes do not eliminate protections already provided by the rule, but simply clarify the
rule to enhance compliance and thereby further improve employee protections. As noted in the discussion above regarding the regulatory impact analysis, the changes are too subtle to be quantified by the economic model used to calculate compliance costs of the HCS. It is expected, however, that if the proposed changes are implemented, the compliance costs would be somewhat reduced for small businesses. OSHA expects that the limited modifications being promulgated in this final rule will not eliminate protections of the rule, but may make the standard more cost-effective. OSHA does not consider this NPRM to be either a major or significant rule. In addition, the changes are too subtle for the economic model to be able to reflect the decreases in the costs. However, it is expected that if the proposed changes are implemented the costs will be somewhat reduced. Many of the claimed costs were also based on misinterpretations of the rule.